Evidence Base
15 studies: 10 independent head-to-head studies (the same samples on two or more high-plex platforms, not vendor-authored) and 5 foundational papers. Across the independent head-to-head studies, 95K+ participants were profiled on at least one compared platform and ~6,600 on two or more. Most of the larger figure comes from Eldjarn et al., 2023, which ran Olink in UK Biobank and SomaScan in Iceland, with 1,514 Icelanders measured on both.
Participants by study
| Study | At least one compared platform | Two or more platforms |
|---|---|---|
| Eldjarn et al., 2023 | 90,157 | 1,514 |
| Nicholas et al., 2026 | 1,930 | 1,930 |
| Pietzner et al., 2026 | 1,464 | 1,396 |
| Katz et al., 2022 | 787 | 787 |
| Bahai et al., 2025 (PRECISE-SG100K) | 500 | 216 |
| Rooney et al., 2023 | 427 | 427 |
| Sissala et al., 2025 | 114 | 88 |
| Haslam et al., 2022 | 104 | 53 |
| Rooney et al., 2025 | 102 | 102 |
| Kirsher et al., 2025 | 78 | 78 |
| Total | 95,663 | 6,591 |
Totals are summed study by study, so anyone in more than one study counts more than once; the two ARIC studies may share participants. Foundational papers are not counted.
Curated evidence base, updated with each release. Last updated: November 2026. Evidence depth varies across platforms: newer platforms (Nomic nELISA, NULISA) have substantially less published head-to-head data than established platforms (Olink, SomaScan/SomaSeq). Studies marked Landmark are key references that directly inform the platform recommendations in this tool. Readout note: Studies citing "SomaScan" used the array-based (microarray) readout. SomaSeq (Illumina; formerly Illumina Protein Prep) is the NGS-based successor; performance differences between readout methods have been reported.
15 of 15 studies
Eldjarn et al., 2023
Landmarkn = 54,265 UK Biobank (Olink) and 35,892 Icelanders (SomaScan); 1,514 Icelanders measured on both
Sun et al. 2023 report 54,219 for the same UKB-PPP cohort.
- Compared Olink Explore 3072 in UK Biobank with SomaScan v4 in Iceland; 1,514 Icelanders were measured on both.
- A cis-pQTL was found for a similar number of assays on each platform (2,101 Olink, 2,120 SomaScan), but for a larger share of Olink assays (72% vs 43%).
- Modest cross-platform correlation: median Spearman 0.33 across 1,848 proteins in the 1,514 Icelanders measured on both.
Katz et al., 2022
n = 787 measured on both platforms: 568 Jackson Heart Study, 219 HERITAGE
- Compared Olink Explore with SomaScan 1.3K and 5K on precision, accuracy, breadth and phenotypic associations in 568 Jackson Heart Study and 219 HERITAGE participants.
- Modest cross-platform correlation for shared targets: median Spearman 0.44 with SomaScan 1.3K, 0.35 with SomaScan 5K.
- Olink gave more phenotypic associations, including among overlapping proteins; SomaScan gave more reproducible measurements and greater breadth.
Kirsher et al., 2025
Landmarkn = 78 plasma donors (40 aged, 38 young), measured on all eight platforms
- Direct comparison of eight platforms on plasma from the same 78 donors: SomaScan 11K and 7K, Olink Explore HT and 3072, NULISA, Seer Proteograph XT, Biognosys TrueDiscovery and SureQuant targeted MS.
- SomaScan achieved best precision (median CV 5.3% for 11K, 5.8% for 7K).
- Olink Explore HT median CV ~26.8%; Seer ~26.4%; Biognosys ~29.8%
Rooney et al., 2023
n = 427 ARIC participants measured on both platforms
Disclosure: SomaLogic ran SomaScan on ARIC samples at no charge under a collaboration agreement with Johns Hopkins, and one author is a scientific advisor to SomaLogic.
- Comparison in 427 ARIC participants at visit 5 (2011 to 2013).
- SomaScan v4 vs Olink Proseek head-to-head on the same samples: 417 protein comparisons (366 unique proteins).
- Average cross-platform correlation r = 0.46 (range -0.21 to 0.97); 19% of pairs had r ≥ 0.8.
Rooney et al., 2025
n = 102 ARIC participants measured on both platforms
Disclosure: SomaLogic provided the assays at no cost and had no control over design or analysis; one author served on its scientific advisory committee in 2022-2023.
- Precision of SomaScan 11k and Olink Explore HT in split plasma samples from 102 ARIC participants: median CV 6.8% and 35.7%.
- Cross-platform correlations for 4,443 overlapping proteins peaked near r = 0 and r = 0.8, and one-tenth of pairs had r ≥ 0.8. The median was 0.14, below the 0.33 reported for earlier platform versions.
- Olink Explore HT precision tracks detectability (r = -0.77 with percent of samples above the limit of detection); its median CV falls to 13.3% when below-LOD values are set to half the LOD.
Haslam et al., 2022
n = 104 participants across four Olink experiments; 53 of them also on SomaScan (14 delayed-processing, 39 sampled one year apart)
- Compared stability and reproducibility of Olink (972 proteins) and SOMAscan 7K (6,596 proteins) in archived plasma.
- Both platforms showed reproducibility in archived plasma and stability after delayed processing; over 90% of assays were stable (ICC or r ≥ 0.40) in samples collected a year apart.
- With processing delayed by up to 48 hours, more Olink than SOMAscan assays stayed stable: 55% vs 44% at ICC or r ≥ 0.75, 87% vs 72% at ≥ 0.40.
Pietzner et al., 2026
Landmarkn = 1,464 Genes & Health participants; 1,396 measured on all three platforms
- Compared nanoparticle-enriched MS (Seer Proteograph XT) with SomaLogic 11k and Olink Explore HT in British South Asian participants; 1,396 were measured on all three.
- Seer detected 8,079 protein groups at least once, 5,768 of them in at least 70% of samples.
- Showed the potential of MS-based proteomics for pQTL discovery in non-European ancestries: over 1,200 locus-protein associations, more than half not previously reported.
Feng et al., 2023 (NULISA)
FoundationalVendor-authored (Alamar Biosciences)n = 151 samples from 79 healthy donors and 72 patients (assay validation)
- Attomolar-level sensitivity: limit of detection 10 aM (0.24 fg/mL) for HIV p24 in plasma.
- Dual capture-and-release mechanism suppresses assay background, improving proximity ligation sensitivity about 10,000-fold.
- 200-plex panel was more sensitive than a proximity extension assay (Olink Explore) for low-abundance biomarkers in patients with autoimmune diseases and COVID-19.
Dagher et al., 2025 (nELISA)
FoundationalVendor-authored (Nomic Bio)n = 7,392 cell-culture samples from PBMCs of 6 donors (assay validation; no participant cohort)
- A 191-plex inflammation panel profiled 7,392 PBMC samples, about 1.4 million measurements.
- Antibody pairs are preassembled on barcoded beads; in spike-in testing of the 191-plex panel, 5 of more than 36,000 possible noncognate interactions were detected.
- 1,536 wells per day on one cytometer in 384-well format; 7,392 samples on a 191-plex panel in under one week.
Sissala et al., 2025
n = 114 patients by mass spectrometry; 88 of them also by Olink
- Compared HiRIEF LC-MS/MS with Olink Explore 3072 on 88 plasma samples; 1,129 proteins were measured by both.
- Median cross-platform Spearman correlation ρ=0.59 (IQR 0.33–0.75); rises to ρ=0.68 on high-quality subset
- Platforms exhibit complementary coverage: Olink stronger at low-abundance targets; MS stronger at mid-to-high abundance
Bahai et al., 2025 (PRECISE-SG100K)
n = 500 PRECISE-SG100K participants on SomaScan; 216 also on Olink, 50 also on Seer
- Pilot for planned profiling of all 100,000 PRECISE-SG100K participants: 500 participants on SomaScan 11K, 216 of them also on Olink Explore HT, 50 also on MS-Seer.
- Three-platform comparison in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort (Chinese, Indian and Malay).
- Protein levels differed between ethnic groups. SomaScan identified more ethnicity-differentiated proteins than Olink, and 191 proteins were robust across datasets.
Rea Reyes et al., 2025
Foundationaln = 252 plasma samples on the NULISAseq CNS panel; 218 also measured by Simoa p-tau217
- NULISAseq p-tau217 classified amyloid and tau PET status with areas under the curve of 0.92 and 0.86.
- NULISAseq p-tau217 correlated with Simoa p-tau217 (r = 0.84, n = 218), and the two assays were comparable for amyloid PET, both with areas under the curve above 0.90.
- The panel also measures ApoE4 protein, which was raised in amyloid-positive participants; the authors attribute this to the higher prevalence of APOE ε4.
Zeng et al., 2024
Foundationaln = 176 plasma samples from 113 MYHAT-NI participants on the NULISAseq CNS panel; classical biomarkers also measured by Simoa
- NULISAseq CNS panel measured 116 plasma biomarkers, with 97.2 ± 13.9% of targets above assay limits of detection.
- p-tau217 was the top marker of amyloid PET pathology (AUC 0.930 after adjustment for age, sex and APOE genotype).
- Classical Alzheimer's biomarkers correlated significantly with Simoa assays.
Suhre et al., 2025
FoundationalVendor co-authors (Seer)n = 1,260 discovery participants (Tarkin) and 325 replication samples (QMDiab) on the Seer Proteograph
- Genome-wide association study of MS proteomics using the Seer Proteograph workflow on a timsTOF Pro 2, reporting 35 previously unreported replicated pQTLs.
- Over 30% of previously reported affinity pQTLs evaluated were confirmed by MS as consistent with changes in protein abundance.
- Another 30% could not be replicated and are possibly due to epitope effects, though the authors say other explanations need case-by-case consideration.
Nicholas et al., 2026
n = 1,930 MESA participants measured on both SomaScan 7k and Olink Explore 3072
- 2,157 proteins measured on both platforms; inter-platform correlations were bimodal (median r = 0.30).
- About 25 to 30% of genetic signals on each platform are likely driven by protein-altering variants.
- 80 proteins correlated differently across ancestry groups, likely in part because protein-altering variant frequencies differ by ancestry.
