Atlas of Proteomic Technologies

Ignition Scientific

Help Me Combine

As population-scale plasma proteomics matures and the measurement landscape diversifies, investigators may wish to employ more than one technology to widen biological coverage. This tool ranks how well two platforms work together, either by suggesting the best second platform to add to one you already have, or by recommending the strongest pair from scratch. Tell us your top priorities and the ranking follows them; no single factor is privileged by default.

Where are you starting?

Coverage denominator

Which reference set to measure coverage against; this changes what 'coverage' means for every pair below.

What matters most? Pick up to 3

Breadth

Measurement properties

Practical

Special

Pathway filter (optional)

See how much of a specific Reactome pathway each pair covers, shown alongside your ranking. This is a reference view, not a new priority: it never changes any pair's composite score.

Your Result

A few choices, then your recommendation

Make each selection on the left. The recommendation appears only once all of them are set, so nothing is pre-decided for you.

1. Where are you starting?
2. What is your coverage denominator (targets, biomarkers, PTMs, all proteins)?
3. What are your top priorities (specificity, cost, absolute quant, etc.)?

Reproducibility: data and code

The scoring engine specification, a self-contained sweep script, and both sweep outputs behind the fairness analysis above are downloadable from the Reproducibility tab.

Open Reproducibility →